If One is Good, Quad is Better!

Play Spider Solitaire at fireball speed!Today, in my quest to understand just what could make a computer cost $30,000, I’m going to drill down on the processor that PC World editors have chosen for their dream machine.

That would be the Intel Core 2 Extreme Quad Processor QX9975. The plan is to put two of these into the system.

This processor has four processing cores (whatever they are) and a 45 nanometer lithography, which is small. (I know what that means.) The processor speed is a blazing 3.2 gigahertz. If that were typing performance, I’m pretty sure your fingertips would catch fire.

Although descriptions of this chip say that it’s great for multi-threaded games and multimedia applications, it’s probably best suited for server operations — where a whole bunch of processes are hitting the computer for data access or processing power all at the same time. How could a lone human being sitting at a keyboard be that needy? OK, so I’m not a gamer and I don’t do high-end GPS mapping work. Maybe you could be that needy.

Of course, even as PC World was putting in its quad-core order, Intel was announcing that it expects to ship a six-core processor later this year, according to Computerworld.

The story quotes a senior VP and general manager of Intel’s Digital Enterprise Group as saying, “The big cache and six cores will give customers a nice bump in performance.” Plus, it keeps Intel ahead of the speed game compared to AMD, which just announced it is shipping a triple-core processor as part of its Phenom series.

I suppose that if you’re spending $1,500 to get a custom paint job for the box that holds the computer components as PC World is, you don’t want to be putting in a little $300 processor — or even two of them. You want to go with what’s newest, fastest, and priciest. In that regard, the magazine has done it again!

Posted on March 17th, 2008 by dian

Previous post: Buying a PC with XP Next post: Vista, yes, but not yet

Leave a Reply